Lukashenko’s seventh rodeo: Belarus prepares for a presidential election
What is the goal of the opposition and how does the international community view Alexander Lukashenko’s next presidential term? Read Full Article at RT.com
What is the goal of the opposition and how does the international community view Alexander Lukashenko’s next presidential term?
On Sunday, Belarus will hold its seventh presidential election since gaining independence. Incumbent President Alexander Lukashenko, who has been in power since 1994, is once again running, continuing his nearly three-decade reign. Despite a relatively calm election season compared to the mass protests and unrest of 2020, the upcoming vote has drawn significant attention both domestically and internationally. The focus remains on the pro-Western opposition’s limited presence, the geopolitical stakes, and Lukashenko’s evolving policies.
Who’s on the Ballot?
The Central Election Commission (CEC) of Belarus has registered five candidates, including Lukashenko himself, who earlier had hinted he might step aside after his current term. Yet, his decision to run again underscores his continued hold on the country’s political system.
“I don’t cling to power,” Lukashenkosaid during his campaign. “I will do everything to quietly and peacefully pass it on to a new generation. I hope I will live under a new government.”
Two other potential candidates dropped out last November to support Lukashenko, solidifying the president’s dominant position.
Opposition on the Sidelines
The pro-Western opposition, which led mass protests after the controversial 2020 election, has little presence in this campaign. Most of its leaders are in exile, including Svetlana Tikhanovskaya, who continues to refer to herself as Belarus’ “elected president” while engaging with Western governments.
Domestically, authorities are bracing for any potential unrest. Security measures include restrictions on photographing or filming ballots, potential internet outages attributed to “technical maintenance,” and the deployment of police and military forces. Lukashenko has warned that “security will be maintained at any cost,” leaving little room for pro-Western opposition activities within Belarusian borders.
International Reactions
The global response to the election has been largely symbolic. Western nations, particularly Lithuania and the United States, have criticized the process. Lithuanian Parliamentary Speaker Saulius Skvernelis described the vote as a “farce” and urged the European Union to act decisively. The US. State Department issued a warning to American citizens, advising them to leave Belarus amid concerns over potential border closures and new sanctions.
Former US Secretary of State Antony Blinken echoed these sentiments, stating, “Elections cannot be considered credible in an environment where censorship is pervasive, independent media no longer exists, only government-approved candidates can be nominated, and opposition members are imprisoned or exiled.”
In contrast, Minsk’s allies have expressed support. Observers from the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) will monitor the election, though their presence is unlikely to influence its outcome.
Stability and Lukashenko’s Strategy
Unlike the volatile atmosphere of 2020, when protests rocked Belarus, the current election period appears far more stable. Lukashenko’s approval rating, according to official data, exceeds 80%, making a runoff election highly unlikely. A victory would extend his presidency until 2030, further solidifying his role as Europe’s longest-serving leader.
Key to this stability is Lukashenko’s adept maneuvering on the geopolitical stage. By deepening ties with Russia and China, he has offset Western sanctions and bolstered Belarus’ economy. His promise to construct a new nuclear power plant and enhance national defense capabilities are used to underscore his declared commitment to ensuring Belarus’ sovereignty in a rapidly changing world order.
Interestingly, constitutional amendments enacted several years ago limit presidents to two terms. However, this restriction does not apply to Lukashenko, whose previous terms have been reset, allowing him to run indefinitely. This legal loophole highlights his ability to navigate and adapt to the political system he has meticulously constructed.
For Russia, the election’s outcome is a foregone conclusion, but its implications are significant. Lukashenko’s continued leadership ensures the stability of the Union State partnership between Moscow and Minsk. This relationship has become even more critical amid the Ukraine conflict, with Belarus serving as a strategic ally and logistical hub for Russian operations.
However, challenges remain. While Lukashenko has maintained Belarus’ independence, balancing relations with Russia and China against Western pressure, this tightrope act becomes increasingly difficult as the geopolitical landscape evolves. His ability to navigate these complexities will determine Belarus’ position in the emerging multipolar world.
Conclusion
The upcoming presidential election in Belarus is less about competition and more about continuity. With the opposition marginalized and Lukashenko’s dominance unchallenged, the focus shifts to his ability to address pressing domestic issues while maintaining geopolitical stability. As Western nations criticize the process and Minsk’s allies rally in support, the election underscores the country’s role as a linchpin in the broader struggle between East and West.
For now, Alexander Lukashenko remains firmly in control, charting a course for Belarus through turbulent times. Whether his vision for the country aligns with the aspirations of its people and the demands of the international community remains to be seen. What is certain, however, is that Sunday will mark another chapter in the enduring political saga of Europe’s most resilient leader.
